Barack Obama Is Not New, He is An Old Fashioned Socialist Who Will “Spread the Wealth Around”

October 19, 2008 at 1:48 pm 1 comment

Barack claims his “Change” will lead us forward to new politics.

In reality Obama represents a return to the past, a return to the failed socialist policies of passing the wealth around. His is a politics not of equal opportunity but of equal wealth. His is a politics of the 1919 Communist movement of “to each according to his needs from each according to his means.” Obama is a pure Trotsky Communist.

There is nothing new about Obama.

Nobody was ever hired to a good job by a poor person. Only people with money are able to hire people. Don’t believe me? Go to any public housing project and ask one of the Obama supporters living there to give you a job.

At the time when our nation desperately needs new jobs, Obama wants to raise taxes on the small businesses who created all repeat ALL the new jobs of the last five years as mutinationals moved jobs overseas to lower tax nations.

Obama’s socialism of taking money from the only employers left in America will make it impossible for them to add jobs.

Obama will destroy what is left of America.

 To help impeach Obama from the Senate and, god forbid, from the Presidency, send a blank email to


Entry filed under: abc news, ann coulter, bailout, bankruptcy, Barack Obama, Blogroll, cbs news, cnbc, cnn, cnn bias, family, Fannie Mae, finance, fox news, Freddie Mac, glenn beck, john mccain, life, lou dobbs, Michelle Obama, mortgages, New York Times, news, politics, presidential campaign, sarah palin, taxes, Uncategorized. Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , .

HELP Do You Have Pics of Obama Snarling in First Presidential Debate? Obama the Slumlord

1 Comment Add your own

  • 1. preservetherepublic  |  October 19, 2008 at 8:09 pm

    How many people would be happy if their child had a teacher who lowered their child’s grade for no reason and gave their points to another student so they could pass? Let’s say they have a teacher named Mr. Obama who lowered their child’s A+ to a B- and then raised another child’s grade from a D- to a C+. Would that be fair even if the D- child worked harder than the A+ child? The A+ child would be penalized for success and the D- student still wouldn’t know how to succeed.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed

Blog Stats

  • 52,045 hits

%d bloggers like this: