More On Obama’s Birth Certificate

December 28, 2008 at 11:35 am 3 comments

Apparently the Courts are setting precedents so that Obama’s birth certificate might not look so phony. Read the excellent post on the newest “cover up for obama” court decision at the newest addition to my blogroll, the terrific post

Entry filed under: abc news, ann coulter, Barack Obama, Blogroll, cbs news, cnbc, family, feminism, lou dobbs, New York Times. Tags: , , , , , , , , .

Celebration! Already Just Passed 12,000 Views Is Chelsea Clinton to Wed Into Convicted Felon Family?

3 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Ted  |  December 28, 2008 at 1:39 pm


    Since the Supreme Court has now prevented itself from acknowledging the question of whether Barack H. Obama is or is not an Article II “natural born citizen” based on the Kenyan/British citizenship of Barack Obama’s father at the time of his birth (irrespective of whether Barack Obama is deemed a “citizen” born in Hawaii or otherwise) as a prerequisite to qualifying to serve as President of the United States under the Constitution — the Court having done so at least three times and counting, first before the Nov 4 general election and twice before the Dec 15 vote of the College of Electors — it would seem appropriate, if not necessary, for all Executive Branch departments and agencies to secure advance formal advice from the United States Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel as to how to respond to expected inquiries from federal employees who are pledged to “support and defend the Constitution of the United States” as to whether they are governed by laws, regulations, orders and directives issued under Mr. Obama during such periods that said employees, by the weight of existing legal authority and prior to a decision by the Supreme Court, believe in good faith that Mr. Obama is not an Article II “natural born citizen”.

    Moreover, each and every member of Congress should be notified that he or she is personally liable (can be sued) for his or her own failure, or the same in conspiracy with other members, to perform what is a ministerial and constitutional duty, that is, to require and/or insist that Presidential electoral votes only be counted for candidates who are “natural born citizens” under Article II of the United States Constitution, the failure of which creates a cause of action for deprivation of claimants’ constitutional rights (as allowed under the Bivens case) against employees of the Federal Government, in this case, to a lawful President and Commander in Chief, and therefore, for deprivation of adequate continuation of the United States as a Constitutional Republic. The constitutionally tortious conduct is not subject to congressional immunity and would be the jettison of Article II of the Constitution by failure to stop and/or object to the counting of electoral votes for Barack H. Obama who has admitted that at the time of his birth his father was a Kenyan/British citizen and not a citizen of the United States of America.

    Finally, if 1/20/09 comes and goes with a usurper in the Whitehouse (that is, Obama is definitely NOT an Article II “natural born citizen” — dad Kenyan/British citizen at BHO’s birth — albeit he MAY be a 14th Amendment “citizen”) with usurper enablers in Congress and the Supreme Court … God help us because many of the people will — rightfully and under our Constitution and Declaration of Independence — endeavor through other means to take back the Government from what is nothing less than a non-constitutional coup d’etat. (SCOTUS now does have the power to forestall that grim yet inevitable scenario, otherwise the blood and possible loss of our Constitutional Republic is SQUARELY ON THEIR HEADS.)

  • 2. Maura  |  December 28, 2008 at 3:17 pm

    While what you say is what SHOULD be done, we all know it will not happen. It would not be politically correct. And, worse yet, WHO would become president? Biden, who speaks of the importance of the 3-letter word – JOBS..??? Or, McCain, who suspended his campaign to go to Washington to sign the bail-out that he didn’t approve of ??

    Poor America. Democracy has failed us. Too many people are allowed to vote. If you don’t pay taxes, if you receive welfare of any kind, if you haven’t filed a tax return in the past 5 years, please explain to me how you are qualified to make decisions about how the tax money is spent?????

  • 3. R Dujour  |  December 28, 2008 at 3:39 pm

    Philip Berg’s case is still alive

    Webster Tarpley talks with Attorney Philip Berg about his case (08-570) still before the Supreme Court which questions whether Barack Obama is a natural born citizen and thus constitutionally qualified to be president of the United States. This case has been reported to be closed by hundreds of news sources and yet it here it appears on the Supreme Court docket scheduled for January 16, 2009.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed

Blog Stats

  • 52,404 hits

%d bloggers like this: