Posts tagged ‘gays’
More than a year ago Oprah Winfrey had six single women on her show, all of which had been infected with HIV/Aids for several years. Strikingly, amazingly, incredibly, every one said that they were continuing to have sex with new men, and half of them said they were not telling their new sexual partners that they were infected.
Three of them were not using condoms!
Got that? They were intentionally infecting more men with HIV/Aids!
They said things like “Whoever infected me didn’t tell me, so why should I tell anyone?”
Now I am so simple minded that I believe those women should be arrested and institutionalized so they cannot spread fatal infections to unsuspecting, innocent people.
Actually, I believe they should be executed.
Every year there are more and more HIV/Aids infections. Therefore, large numbers of infected people are continuing to spread the disease.
We cannot learn how bad the problem is because the not so gay “gays” and queers have gotten laws passed so that it is a serious federal crime to tell that some crumbum has HIV/Aids.
I believe that everyone infected with HIV should have a scarlet “A” branded on their foreheads. That seems to be the only way to stop the spread of an incurable, inevitably fatal disease.
If someone has a better and MORE EFFECTIVE way to stop the spread of AIDS, please document the scientific article proving the effectiveness in the comments.
Now what does Obama have to do with this?
Obama has just proven that he does not care about the health of our people y signing a law that lets people enter the USA even though they are know to be incurably infected with HIV/Aids.
Of course, once they are inside the world’s newest banana republic, don’t you just bet that their little bananas are going to start infecting the rest of us?
So the banana republic’s top banana made it legal for rotten bananas to spoil the barrel!
Once a person has been infected with HIV/Aids, the medical cost until the prolonged but still inevitable death is more than a million dollars ($1,000,000).
That is one of the reasons why America has the highest per capita medical costs in the world.
Under Obama’s new law, the imported but avoidable medical costs will add still more to the deficit that is bankrupting our Nation.
It is the Barack Obama deficit, combined with his derelict lack of concern for the welfare of productive citizens and lack of morality that makes the USA the world’s newest banana republic.
October 30, 2009 at 7:04 pm
A veteran who defended his country says he is now defending his right to support the military. The battle is with his homeowners association. Apparently, as seen in the video, Obama and Code Pink stickers found on other cars in the parking lot are not considered “advertisements” and are okay with the HOA president, but U.S. Marine Corps stickers are considered “advertisements” and not okay.
This news item is from Hyscience, a member of my blogroll. Please click on this link to see the video of this incident by the local TV station
http://www.hyscience.com/archives/2009/05/hoa_asks_marine.php
May 28, 2009 at 6:25 pm
It started when the not at all gay “gays” set fire to Sarah Palin’s church, with women and children inside, because the church was conducting sessions counseling “gays” to overcome their affliction. A new law, Raised Bill No. 1098, or simply CT 1098, was introduced in Connecticut, supposedly “the Constitution State.”
The wording of CT 1098 specifically states that it is to regulate the Catholic Church, specifically attacking a specific church! Never in the history of America has any legislature been guilty of such a perversion! I am no defender of the Catholic Church. My personal opinion is that it is so corrupt and petrified that it is beyond saving and will slowly disintegrate, but my personal feelings are not relevant.
Our Constitution, our history, our court decisions in common law, are perfectly consistent in supporting the principle that churches are protected from the State. The one exception to this rule is the Internal Revenue Service Ruling that was pushed by the evil Democrats under President Lyndon B. Johnson after Texas preachers opposed his election to the Senate. Evil Johnson got the IRS to rule that churches lose their non-profit status if they mention specific political issues, elections or candidate. Despite the obvious unconstitutionality of this gag order, the Liberal Democrats have kept this rule in place solely for restricting the rights of Conservative and Republican Christians.
The gag order has never been applied to churches that support Democratic Party candidates. Bill Clinton and BS Obama flagrantly violated this gag order throughout all of their election campaigns, conducting campaign events in churches, with black preachers saying “Vote for Obama,” but the IRS has threatened many conservative churches for backing Republican candidates.
Democracy is dying in America; Unconstitutional laws are enforced against Conservative, and ignored for the convenience of Democrats. This is dictatorship.
CT1098 is the strangest law I have ever seen for many reasons:
The bill has no sponsors! Not a single lawmaker had the fortitude, let alone the legal responsibility, to put his name on the bill. This is in the style of totally irresponsible and undemocratic state legislation established by Barack Obama’s irresponsible record of hundred of votes as “present” in the Illinois State Senate. If people were dumb enough to approve that misconduct by electing the miscreant President, CT 1098 is your reward!
The bill claims it is about financial fraud and corporate governance.
First, there are plenty of laws covering fraud.
Second, governance of a church is not the business of the State.
The bill is actually a backdoor method for militant gays to take control of Catholic parishes and dioceses to force support of gay marriage and other gay issues. This is why no lawmaker would put his name on the bill! There is nothing gay about “gays” who are not gay at all, but are vicious anti-democratic dictators who want to illegally force their will on the majority. CT 1098 is so unconstitutional that even a retarded gay should understand that it violates the First Amendment of the Constitution, and violates Thomas Jefferson’s separation of church and state.
Catholic or not, all Americans should be outraged over this. This bill is a gross overreach of power, not to mention a disgusting infringement on Connecticut citizens’ constitutional religious liberties. The government has no right whatsoever to regulate the structure of any religious organization.
Please call Senator McDonald and Representative Lawlor, and let them know that what they are doing is unacceptable. Again, whether or not you are a Catholic or a citizen of Connecticut is irrelevant. All Americans have the right to freedom of religion, and an infringement on that right anywhere can affect all of us. This is an ugly step towards fascism, and we cannot stand for it.
Call or email these idiots and tell them what you think and come to the rally in Hartford today Wednesday, March 11, 2009.
Senator Andrew McDonald: (800) 842-1420; (203) 348-7439
E-mail: McDonald@senatedems.ct.gov
Representative Michael Lawlor: (800) 842-8267; (203) 469-9725
E-mail: MLawlor99@juno.com
March 11, 2009 at 10:10 am
Obama must bailout or nationalize bordellos as supply side economics. Free Healthcare Means If you get the 6 hour erection from Viagra, you get a free bordello pass, not a doctor. Change you can believe in.
Hustler publisher Larry Flynt and Girls Gone Wild CEO Joe Francis said Wednesday they will request that Congress allocate $5 billion for a bailout of the adult entertainment industry. Why would we want to bailout mere fantasy images when we can nationalize the fundamental source. We can bailout the supply!
Our new President wants to spend an amount equal to all the taxes that will be collected in the next hundred years to reward people who cannot comprehend that a mortgage means you are actually supposed to pay for your home, and that your new four bedroom mansion with stainless steel appliances and granite counters is not part of the Section 8 free welfare housing you just moved out of.
Well, we have legalized executive crime. We are already subsidizing other business criminals, such as the auto executives and Wall Street and the ACORN fraudulent mortgages.
We might as well continue the government programs designed by the Democratic Party to destroy marriage and the family by legalizing prostitution.
Low income, and especially no income taxpayers, must be able to check a box on their no tax return saying whether or not they have enough cash for prostitutes, and if they don’t, the government absolutely must send out a voucher good for one free visit to the bordello every week.
Twice a week if you get a doctor’s letter.
Three times a week if the doctor is a specialist.
Maybe we could give them to heterosexual wives. Instead of that “I have a headache” routine, they could just ration out an Obama bordello coupon if hubby is nice about the rejection. This might actually reduce the divorce rate. See, bordellos can improve the quality of life for children who would otherwise suffer from a broken home.
For those of you under age thirty, “broken home” is an “Olde Englishe” term previously used to refer to that horror of horrors, a divorce.
In keeping with Obama’s “spread the wealth around” policy, low income men should qualify for welfare bordello vouchers, maybe as part of Food Stamps.
And we cannot have sexual discrimination. Women must also get bordello vouchers as part of their welfare. Of course, unmarried mothers pose a special dilemma: Obviously they found sex somewhere! But can we pay for them to have more sex and more babies for the working taxpayer to support?
Of course we must! They are people. They have rights, and it is not their fault that they are unwilling to work to pay for their rights. God made them that way. Christians must respect that. Besides, if we donate to feed babies, why shouldn’t the government take money away from us to pay for the act of making babies. It is hateful to use a term such as “screwing around!” to refer to the act of creating future welfare recipients.
And if we don’t pay for this, where will the voters come from to re-elect Obama in 2029 to his fifth term as Messiah?
“Give me your poor, your hungry, and we can show them how to vote twice.” Attributed to Mayor Daley, the expert on voting twice. You know, the man who showed Al Franken how to do a recount using a photocopy machine in a car trunk.
But back to basics: If we can pay for men to get sex, we must pay for women to get sex.
And in the interest of true equality, we must establish gay bordellos, because once gays can get married, they will probably suffer the same absence of sex that afflicts married straight men. And aas a humantarian, I really want to give them a reason to feel “gay.”
We must not forget the huge population of unfortunate gay women trapped in marriages to straight men. Psychologists must be able to dispense free Medicaid vouchers to lesbian bordellos for these victims of straight marriages.
Muslims have the right to get bordellos with foot baths and prayer rugs in case the six hour Viagra erection overlaps with prayer times. And the girls would wear facial scarves. Maybe someone could email me about how Burkhas would fit in this government welfare plan?
And if any bordello runs out of cash, we could use tax dollars to bail them out. After all, where could anyone find a man who will not claim he urgently needs more nekkid fems, Ooopps, except in San Francisco?
Then we could give vouchers to doctors, and if someone called in with the erection lasting more than six hours, like the Viagra commercials warn of, then the doctors could prescribe an emergency treatment of six hours in the FEMA run bordello.
Of course, vouchers for the bordello could be part of the Congressional Health Insurance package. This would greatly decrease the scandals in Congress. Such a policy would even have spared the most famous Democrat of all, Hillary Clinton of her husband’s Blue Dress Scandal.
See, sin and crime are entirely determined by perverts demonstrating in the streets and electing “I am not gay” mayors. Oh Oh, is this the ultimate extension of the way Harvard and Nancy Pelosi interpret the separation of Church and state.
The state uses tax dollars to pay for crime and sin, Democratically, whether it be in Detroit, on Wall Street, even in that den of iniquity and sin called Congress.
Church ministers are in violation of the civil rights law and subject to imprisonment if they refer to gays as perverts, or to homosexuality as an abomination.
So, government in the USA advocates and pays for crime, capitalist failures, and sin. To speak out against sin is a civil rights violation.
Oh my God, is this post a civil rights violation? Can I be sent to jail?
Do not put me in jail, please, look; I am advocating legalizing prostitution, including gay prostitution. Isn’t that enough sin to keep me out of jail?
January 11, 2009 at 8:04 pm
This comment is so rich that it deserves posting in full so everyone may see how some people react to free speech. As context, readers should know that this person tried to get WordPress to delete this blog, which has had more than 12,000 visitors during the last ninety days and is growing every day.
her comment is quoted here:___________________________
“Sal, dont bother reasoning with this poor, delusional woman. Unfortunately, there are millions out there who believe in the same stupid lies that she does. I’m glad to see her posting her lies on her own space instead of spamming alot of other people’s blogs.
Some people cant be helped. They will be ridiculous for years to come. My only hope is that they get pissed off enough to break off and form their own country. I dont want them fucking up mine. I dont want people like Nancy teaching my children that their aunt is going to hell, or saying that they’re a bad person because they believe in individual rights. I dont want people like Nancy demanding that my child recite scripture. And I’m 100% positive that the founding fathers didnt either.”
End of comment.__________________________
BEAUTIFUL MIND REPLIES:
Dear bubblie,
First, mind your punctuation.
If you do not want my two brief, clean and respectful comments on your blog, what a rational person would do is click on the email link that accompanies every comment and email me to not comment on your blog. It would take all of 30 seconds.
I would, and will, of course respect your wishes.
However you are welcome to post comments on my blog anytime, and I will approve them regardless of whether or not I agree.
Also, you have the option to delete my comments on your blog, but I see that you have not.
I never use profanity or vulgar words, which apparently you do when posting on my blog above, and that is not appropriate. However, it is nice that you demonstrate your class level. I am amused that you replied you do not believe profanity is low class. We differ on that point.
Your attempt to have WordPress delete my blog when you did not (1) email me to not comment on your blog, and (2) did not delete my comment, indicates that you wish to suppress free speech and are afraid of honest dialogue among people who have a variety of opinions.
Also, your vicious behavior is clearly abusive.
I disagree with everything on your blog, and in your comment, but I am not lying to WordPress to delete your blog as you have done against me!
I did the opposite, supplying a link to your blog so people can read your opinions, and publishing your comment as a full post so my readers can read about your opinion.
That is the difference between so called “gays” who are not at all gay, and those of us capable of politeness, logic, and science.
Note that I approved the comments of many who vehemently disagree with me.
Please note that I am not suppressing your expressions here.
However, you are welcome to post comments on my blog anytime, and I will approve them regardless of whether or not I agree.
Regarding your comment about your being “100% certain that our founding fathers did not want our children to recite scripture in school,” you really might try reading more : Twelve of the thirteen colonies had official state religions, all of which were Christian, and kept them long after adopting our Constitution. Every school was operated by the official State Churches and all did recite scripture. Ministers stood at the polling places and only people who had (1) paid their land taxes in full, and (2) had paid their Church tithes in full were allowed to vote.
Personally, I think we should only allow people to vote if they actually pay taxes. People who don’t work , who live off other people by getting welfare, and do not contribute to our country by paying taxes, obviously have no stake in our country, and will always vote for more welfare. Why wouldn’t they?
Our founding fathers believed this: At the polling place they checked the tax records. To be able to vote, (1) you had to be on the tax records as owning land; (2) your taxes had to be paid up in full.
We would have a better nation if that rule was enforced today.
The letter which atheists wrongly claim as Thomas Jefferson establishing an abolition on state religions, was actually a states’ rights promise that the each of the colonies could keep their twelve DIFFERENT official state Christian religions after adopting the Constitution, and they did. The one colony without an official state religion was, surprise, surprise, New York.
Abe Lincoln, whom some believe was a champion of freedom, signed bills using tax dollars paying for Christian missionaries to convert the Indians!
It would appear that you (1) have no knowledge of the religious foundations of our nation, (2) wish to suppress my freedom of expression, and (3) wish to suppress religious beliefs that are different from yours. How is that different from ignorant dictatorship?
So I ask, which of us supports freedom, and who suppresses discussion and dissent?
NANCY CONTINUES LATER:
That person has now placed three comments on this blog, two of which are ad hominem insults and feature vulgar language and profanity; the third is incomprehensible gibberish. Yet she has accused me of spamming for placing two brief, respectful comments of clean, appropriate language on her blog.
Here is the true spammers last post on my blog, verbatim, in its entirety:
_______________________________
[…] Teehee I r teh gayz! […]
_________________________________
They don’t call them “queers” for nothing.
That posting demonstrates her lack of journalistic ability, lack of intelligence, and that she, in fact, is the spammer.
Her behavior and language reinforces my position that sexual deviants have mental disorders.
December 21, 2008 at 12:59 pm
One of the biggest and most atrocious propaganda victories in history is the theft of the nice and ancient word “gay” as the now universal label for queers, faggots, lesbians, bisexuals, self-mutilated transexuals, and homosexuals.
There is nothing “gay” about being gay.
In fact the history of these perverts is not gay, it is a history of violence and intimidation.
Last year I listened raptly to the granddaughter of the former head of the American Psychiatric Association on National Public Radio. I think that she boasted her great pride how her grandfather participated in lies, intimidation and deception to get homosexuality removed from the APA’s Catalog of Official Diseases. I think she boasted of how he concealed his homosexuality for most of his life, and concealed it from the Republic of Ireland.
Concealed his homosexuality from the Republic of Ireland?
Yep. I think she said that he testified to the Irish parliament, on his authority as President of the American Psychiatric Association, that homosexuality was normal, that there was absolutely no scientific evidence that being queer was either a disease nor an abnormality, and that Ireland should amend its Constitution to permit homosexuals to be President.
Impressed by this expertise of a straight man who was President of the American Psychiatric Association, Ireland did so.
He falsely gave them the impression that this was the official position of the American Psychiatric Association based on scientific studies.
No such thing was true at that time: he flat out lied and deceived the Irish Parliament.
I think that the granddaughter bragged that there was no such scientific evidence, and carried on about how the faggots dressed up in masks and costumes to terrorize the Convention of the Psychiatric Society until they forgot and rejected the science, and made it illegal for any psychiatrist to treat a patient with homosexuality as a disease.
In fact, thanks to this deception, a psychiatrist can lose his medical license for referring to a homosexual as abnormal or sick. Freedom of speech in America? What a joke.
Under the false banner of getting their freedom, gays are stripping our freedom of speech.
Sarah Palin’s church in Alaska was holding workshops to help people who were unhappy with their homosexuality to find ways to deal with it.
The church was not condemning “gays” as perverts.
The new American terrorists who have been rioting in the streets of California and in the media in fury over the majority of the California voters to reject gay marriage, I think set fire to the church.
The fire started with an accelerant, possibly gasoline, spread in the entrances of the church, almost trapping the church ladies and two children inside.
Burning a church with people and children inside!
This brings to mind images of the KKK, and of Obama’s cousin Odinga’s group burning the Kenyan church to the ground while 400 Christians were locked inside.
We need a new, more descriptive name for homosexuals. “Gay” is clearly not descriptive of the truth.
How about “Al Gayda?”
Because queers in America are terrorists.
December 16, 2008 at 3:00 am
Nancy Goldfarb Thinks 